Proceedings

Find matching any: Reset
Mueller, N
Add filter to result:
Authors
Crowther, J
Parrish, J
Ferguson, R
Luck, J
Glewen, K
Shaver, T
Krull, D
Thompson, L
Mueller, N
Krienke, B
Mieno, T
Ingram, T
Parrish, J
Ferguson, R
Luck, J
Glewen, K
Thompson, L
Krienke, B
Mueller, N
Ingram, T
Krull, D
Crowther, J
Shaver, T
Mieno, T
Maharjan, B
Ghimire, D
Creech, C
Easterly, A
Mueller, N
Santra, D
Cesario Pereira Pinto, J
Puntel, L
Thompson, L
Mueller, N
Cesario Pinto, J
Thompson, L
Mueller, N
Mieno, T
Puntel, L
Balboa, G
Topics
State Report
General
Graduate Award Student Poster
Type
Oral
Poster
Year
2017
2020
2021
2022
Home » Authors » Results

Authors

Filter results5 paper(s) found.

1. Integrating Management Zones and Canopy Sensing for Improved Nitrogen Recommendation Algorithms

Active crop canopy sensors have been studied as a tool to direct spatially variable nitrogen (N) fertilizer applications in maize, with the goal of increasing the synchrony between N supply and crop demand and thus improving N use efficiency (NUE). However, N recommendation algorithms have often proven inaccurate in certain subfield regions due to local spatial variability. Modifying these algorithms by integrating soil-based management zones (MZ) may improve their accuracy... J. Crowther, J. Parrish, R. Ferguson, J. Luck, K. Glewen, T. Shaver, D. Krull, L. Thompson, N. Mueller, B. Krienke, T. Mieno, T. Ingram

2. Comparison of Ground-Based Active Crop Canopy Sensor and Aerial Passive Crop Canopy Sensor for In-Season Nitrogen Management

Crop canopy sensors represent one tool available to help calculate a reactive in-season nitrogen (N) application rate in corn. When utilizing such systems, corn growers must decide between using active versus passive crop canopy sensors. The objectives of this study was to 1) determine the correlation between N management by remote sensing using a passive sensor and N management using proximal sensing with an active sensors. Treatments were arranged as field length strips in a randomized complete... J. Parrish, R. Ferguson, J. Luck, K. Glewen, L. Thompson, B. Krienke, N. Mueller, T. Ingram, D. Krull, J. Crowther, T. Shaver, T. Mieno

3. Improving Nitrogen Management in Dryland Winter Wheat Production in Nebraska

Wheat producers in Nebraska endured a significant loss in profit due to reduced grain protein in years that had wet springs such as in 2016 and 2017. Among many potential factors, soil nitrogen (N) is the most central factor that affects protein levels in wheat. To investigate the effect of N on wheat grain yield and protein content, field trials across the State were initiated in 2018. The specific objectives of the field study were to evaluate the effects of different N rates and application...

4. Site-Specific Yield and Protein Response to Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Winter Wheat

Nitrogen (N) fertilizer management is crucial in cereal crop production. Improved prediction of optimal N fertilizer rates for winter wheat can decrease N losses and enhance profits. We tested seven N fertilizer rates (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 kg N ha-1) applied at three timings (Fall, Spring, and Split Fall/Spring) in seven small plot trials located in commercial fields... J. Cesario pereira pinto, L. Puntel, L. Thompson, N. Mueller

5. Benchmarking Nitrogen Recommendation Tools for Nebraska Winter Wheat

Attaining high yield and high nitrogen (N) use efficiency (NUE) remains a current research challenge in crop production. Digital ag technologies for site-specific N management have been demonstrated to improve NUE. This is due to the ability of digital technologies to account for the spatial and temporal distribution of crop N demand and available soil N in the field, which varies greatly according to soil properties, climate, and management. In addition, winter wheat protein content is highly... J. Cesario pinto, L. Thompson, N. Mueller, T. Mieno, L. Puntel, G. Balboa