Proceedings
Year
| Filter results39 paper(s) found. |
|---|
1. Are We Getting Better at Supplying Corn with Nitrogen?While the MRTN approach to making N rate guidelines is an improvement over previous methods, there remains the question about whether or not the database is sufficiently large to support the results adequately. This question is brought into focus when N rates used according to the MRTN guidelines are seen (or at least perceived) as being be inadequate in a given field or area in a given year. Other entities now making N rate recommendations may also market against the MRTN approach by raising do... |
2. Assessing the Status of Soil Phosphorus, Potassium and pH for Soybean Production in OhioSoybeans are one of the most valuable agronomic crops produced in Ohio, and in 2014, the value of Ohio⤙s soybean crop was $2.7 billion making soybean extremely important for agriculture and the economy. To achieve high soybean yields, it is essential to have the proper soil nutrient and pH levels; however, some nutrients can also have detrimental environmental effects. Phosphorus (P) can cause eutrophication of freshwater systems when high quantities enter waterways, furt... A. Brooker, L. Lindsey |
3. Assessing the Use of Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers on Sugarbeet Yield and QualityA field study was initiated in Frankenmuth, MI to study the effects of enhanced efficiency fertilizers in comparison to standard nitrogen (N) programs on sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield and quality. The study was arranged as an 8 treatment randomized complete block design with four replications. All treatments received 40 pounds N/A as 28% UAN applied as a 2x2 (in) at planting with total N applications at 160 pounds N/A. Treatments consisted of urea sidedressed with light cultivation, N appli... C. Bauer, K. Steinke |
4. Better Maize Response to Optimal Fertilizer PlacementIncreasing trends in corn (Zea mays L.) yields require greater levels of applied nutrients per acre to maintain or increase yields; thus, we need to rethink how to best supply a crops⤙ required nutrients. One significant challenge associated with applying more fertilizer to support greater yields has been the negative environmental effects of increased levels of some nutrients, such as phosphorus. Fertilizer application technologies such as banding the fertilizer below the plant increases... |
5. Can Soil Information Better Inform Canopy Sensor Algorithms for Corn?Corn production is often limited by the loss of nitrogen (N) due to leaching, volatilization and denitrification. The use of canopy sensors for making in-season N fertilizer applications has been proven effective in matching plant N requirements with periods of rapid N uptake (V7-V11), reducing the amount of N lost to these processes. However, N recommendation algorithms used in conjunction with canopy sensor measurements have not proven accurate in many fields of the U.S. Cornbelt, resulting in... , N.R. Kitchen, J. Camberato, P.R. Carter, R.B. Ferguson, F.G. Fernandez, D.W. Franzen, F.G. Fernandez, E.D. Nafziger, C.J. Ransom, , J. Shanahan, G.M. Bean |
6. Comparison of Canopy Sensing Technologies for Corn Nitrogen Management in MinnesotaVarious crop canopy sensing tools are being used to manage nitrogen, but their utility to predict N needs in Minnesota remains unclear. The objectives of this study are to compare the effectiveness of different canopy sensing technologies at predicting corn (Zea mays L.) yield at different development stages, and compare their capability to determine in season N deficiency. Six to seven N rates at 35 to 45 kg N ha -1 increments were pre-plant applied in six fields throughout Minnesota and a rate... |
7. Comparison of Congranulated Fertilizer to Blends with S and Zn in Corn and SoybeansHigh yielding corn and soybean production systems in Missouri have renewed an interest in micronutrient management such as sulfur (S) which is essential for protein formation and zinc. (Zn) which is important for enzymes and metabolic reactions. Yield increases due to sulfur applications are more likely to occur during cool, wet springs when mineralization and crop growth are slow as a result of a decrease in atmospheric sulfur deposition. Soil tests in 2010 indicated that over 60% of the sam... M. Caldwell, K. Nelson, B. Burdick |
8. Corn Growth and Yield Responses to Pre-plant and In-season Nitrogen CombinationsIn-season N applications may help synchronize N availability with corn uptake but further investigation is needed to validate different combinations of pre-plant and in-season N strategies. Field experiments were initiated in 2014 to investigate corn response to N management programs involving multiple N-placements, timings, and sources applied at a single N rate at two Michigan locations. Nitrogen management programs were grouped into three strategies utilizing broadcast pre-plant incorporated ... |
9. Corn Nitrogen Evaluation in South DakotaCurrent Nitrogen (N) recommendations for corn in South Dakota use an N rate calculator approach (yield goal x 1.2 ⤓ soil test Nitrate-N (0-2 ft) ⤓ legume credits ⤓ other credits such as manure application or N in starter fertilizers + 30 lbs N/a for no-till). The N coefficient has been modified in the past from 1.45 in 1975, to 1.3 in 1982 and currently 1.2 determined 1991. The N coefficient is in dire need of re-evaluation becaus... A. Bly, S. Berg, P. Sexton, R. Gelderman |
10. Corn Response to Starter Phosphorus in Addition to Fertilizer Banded with Strip-tillageProducersoften question the need for starter fertilizer application in addition to deep band with strip-tillage. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of phosphorus (P) starter on corn (Zea mays) in addition to deep-banded application. A study was conducted at two locations, one under supplemental irrigation and one dry land, with a corn-soybean crop rotation established in the spring of 2006. Strip-tillage was completed before corn in the rotation and soybean was planted withou... |